29 Comments
User's avatar
Heli Hartikainen's avatar

The statement: “the Israeli settlements are a big hinder for peace” is one of the most ridiculous lies created by the Palestinian Authority, repeated by leftist media and believed by the corrupt UN and the blue-eyed antisemitic West. This belief comes from the same pattern than every other fabricated lie because people don’t think rationally and don’t want to know the truth which is usually the opposite of what continually has been told. Judea and Samaria are the Israeli heartland, the cradle of Jewish history, culture and religion. Fabricated “Palestinians” have no roots on those areas so the statement of the ICJ that the Jews should withdraw from those areas and East Jerusalem was the most absurd and arrogant I’ve ever heard. As is the plan to create an Islamic state of Palestine on those areas inside small Israel. “That would bring peace in the Middle-East”. (What could go wrong?!) I cannot believe that even the Western leaders would be so stupid believing that lie but unfortunately their deeds show that they really are stupid. There is no other word besides antisemitism to describe that fact. The Muslims have already over 50 states, Israel only one tiny state. So why in the world Arabs who originally come from neighboring Arab states (between 1890-1948) and who have shown NO ability in living in peace should get a state inside Israel!?!?! F***ing corrupted antisemitic International Community that is conquered by Islamists, dictatorships and leftist-marxist policies! I am ashamed of the President and the Foreign Ministry of my own country Finland who have affiliated with their point of view concerning Israel and so called “Palestinian” Arabs. Those leaders of my country have recently received some “teaching” letters from me and many other fervent Israel friends…😊

Expand full comment
Heli Hartikainen's avatar

Your”NobleKoran” is lying. There is only one truth and you find it in the Holy Bible!

Expand full comment
Puck's avatar

Every Jew with any integrity should immediately vacate every inch of land The Noble Koran designates as Palestine. And that land should be given to the very people The Noble Koran calls "Palestinians."

To find the precise boundaries of this land as set out in The Noble Koran, google "Koran Palestine."

To prove beyond a shadow of doubt the connection of this particular people to this particular land, google "Koran Palestinians."

On the other, to prove that there were no such thing as Jews, Israelites, God's Covenant with the Jews of a Promised Land, google "Koran Jews, Israelites, Moses" to see for yourself that they are nowhere to be found in The Noble Koran.

Thus The Noble Koran proves once and for all the absolute legitimacy of all Palestinian claims.

Expand full comment
Hannahminnea's avatar

Yawn

Expand full comment
Chrissy Knott's avatar

Thanks for the info. I had heard before about illegal Palestinian construction on area C but right now I think Israel needs to draw its borders and forget dealing with PA. You can’t make a truce or discuss disputes with Islam. Israel should know that.either take all of the mandate or all of area C. It seems crazy to me as an outsider that anyone would be forced to negotiate with terrorism. PA is a terrorist organization whether the world accepts that or not. Pay to slay is terrorism!

Expand full comment
Mendl Malkin's avatar

Great article! 1 quibble though.....you refer to "Palestinians" without using scare quote marks around the term to indicate its fallaciousness. A better term would be "Arabs", or "the Arabs who live in the disputed territories". There is a Chinese proverb that "the beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names." Let's start to do that.

Expand full comment
DocSue's avatar

How can the area be disputed if it is Israeli land under the default international law of UTI Possidetis Juris - applied when Israel declared its independence?

Expand full comment
Beatrice Nora Caflun's avatar

Thank you so much for setting the record straight !!!.....Why is still called the West Bank ?....It is Judea and Samaria and belongs to Israel !.....

Expand full comment
Ezekiel Detroit's avatar

Not Palestinians. They are actually Hamastinians.

Expand full comment
Mr. Ala's avatar

Illegal settlements with no Jews in them aren’t illegal settlements, so far as the world is concerned.

Expand full comment
Diane Steiner's avatar

Thank you for the facts and historical content about this egregious situation. I'm so perplexed at a country like Israel who fought for, and won and acquired land, only to give much of it back to an enemy. Men and women died to win wars for Israel, and to give it back and be abused is absurd. I would think the Israeli government understands the Arab mind better than anyone, and yet to give back what was won to the PA who would like to bury Jewish history is appalling. The news media not covering these facts is not surprising, but our Western leaders should be ashamed. Watching a documentary a while back, Abbas laughed when the Oslo Accords was mentioned. Is it any wonder why? He has gotten the best part of the deal, with or without the Oslo Accords or by any legal means. The maps, show a jumbled mess, that makes it ripe for conflict. Israel cannot afford to make the mistakes it had in the past, as was evident on October 7th.

Expand full comment
DrMike's avatar

Nachum: I agree with at least 90% of what you wrote here. But there is one point that I have a question about: "The Jewish extremists, not all of whom live in Judea and Samaria, who attack Palestinians are problematic and should be brought under control, as should those who build illegal Jewish outposts." I fully agree! But from what I read (Times of Israel, not the NY Times, not Haaretz) neither the Jewish extremists nor the illegal outposts are being brought under control, especially now that Ben Gvir is in the government. Is that a correct impression?

Expand full comment
Nachum Kaplan's avatar

Broadly, that is correct, it has gotten worse since Ben Gvir.

Expand full comment
Sandra's avatar

I find this distressing regardless of the egregious actions of the other side.

Expand full comment
Steve S's avatar

Very informative article, I learned alot.

Expand full comment
Daniel Clarke-Serret's avatar

Very interesting. I suppose that the counter argument is that if - big if - the Palestinians actually wanted a State it needs to be big enough to be viable so while the territory is disputed most of it should be left available for a potential future Palestinian State. Centrists want to keep this option open at least in theory

Expand full comment
Sandra's avatar

Interesting perspective. I found this article eye-opening, as someone who hithertofore felt vaguely bad about West Bank Israeli settler violence without knowing anything about the overall history and context. I would love to read an opposing view by someone reasonable and educated just to see what the other side would say.

Expand full comment
Puck's avatar

This article relies heavily on the Oslo Accords. Regardless of the fact that they are drawn up between two political rather than two commercial entities, viz. Israel and the PA, they are nonetheless legal contracts and as such the usual and customary provisions of Contract Law applies to them.

One such provision is "Material Breach of Contract" defined as

"when a party fails to fulfill a significant obligation in a contract, causing substantial harm to the other party. A material breach can:

-Substantially defeat the purpose of the contract

-Deprive the injured party of a benefit they reasonably expected

-Make it impossible for the non-breaching party to receive what was agreed to" ~ see google: Material Breach of Contract.

Even a cursory reading of the Accords and a passing knowledge of local events, such as the second intifada, the PA pay-for-slay program, and what is taking place in Gaza reveals that the PA has materially breached the contract rendering it null and void. It only remains for the Israeli government to finally discover that it actually does possess cajones in its pants and take immediate legal action to formally terminate the contract.

Expand full comment
Daniel J. Arbess's avatar

Nachum, why are we even continuing to talk about partitioning the land West of the Jordan River (aside from the fact that the Arabs have never accepted even the most generous Israeli offers and giveaways? is it not correct that the original Palestinian Mandate established by the British after WWI included much greater areas of Jewish biblical bequeath, basically everything citied in Torah to the from the Euphrates River in Iraq—the entire Levant? If so, should it be pointed out that years before the discussions about the area West of the Jordan River, the Jewish ambition had already limited itself to less than a small portion of the biblical homeland, now known as Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.

Expand full comment
Good Humor by CK Steefel's avatar

Excellent explanation. I’m not sure why the area is even disputed since the IDF took back in 1967 what was initially Israel in 1948.

Expand full comment
David Levine's avatar

This article important and informative. I would add one question and one statement:

1. Why are they always Arab towns and villages vs. Israeli settlements?

2. There is no such thing as an Israeli ‘settler’ in the West Bank https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-754746

Expand full comment
Just plain Rivka's avatar

“Settlements” are the excuse for Jews to turn against each other, instead of the barbaric savages trying to murder us all.

Expand full comment