First they came for the Jews... Yawn.
Pastor Martin Niemöller's poem is a pessimistic, selfish, lazy person’s response to injustice. And the vast majority of non-Jews cannot even muster the energy to rise to that negligible request.
Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.
This is a guest essay written by Pat Johnson of Pat’s Substack.
You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify.
Pastor Martin Niemöller, a German Lutheran theologian who was imprisoned by the Nazis, wrote a famous poem, which is an oft-quoted mantra of various people:
When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent; I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats, I remained silent; I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists, I did not speak out; I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.
I have always found it ironic that anyone, really, would invoke this poem. (Is it a poem? It does not even rhyme!) Ostensibly, it is a call to vigilance. In practice, it is a cynical call to self-interest.
Less a call to arms against antisemitism, it is a warning that if you do not stand up for people who are oppressed when evil comes for them, there may be nobody left to come to the aid when evil comes for someone you actually give a damn about.
Niemöller wrote the piece in 1946. And for at least as long as people have been reciting it, they have been coming for the Jews. Yet what have we (or almost anyone else) done about it other than recite poems and bromides like these?
At synagogues in North America, at kibbutzim in southern Israel, at Jewish institutions across Europe and Australia and South America, the amorphous they have been coming for the Jews. And what have we done?
We have dismissed every one of these incidents, effectively, as a (perhaps) sad but inevitable byproduct of the Middle East conflict.
When opportunities have presented themselves for good people to stand up in opposition to antisemitism and violence against Jews, we have opted overwhelmingly for silence.
A few evangelical and other Christians express empathy and outrage. Politicians, especially those with significant Jewish constituencies, issue statements.
A few kindhearted souls have sent cards or emails promising to pray for the safety of the Jews — I have received some of them when my workplace, Hillel, had rocks thrown through its windows on the anniversary of Kristallnacht and when two of our students were beaten up and had their Stars of David ripped from the chains around their necks.
But hardly as many who have recited Niemöller’s chestnut over the years, or who have bought fridge magnets bearing his words, or taped posters to their walls expressing Niemöller’s sentiments or expressed thoughts of a general good nature have actually come to the aid of Canadian or Israeli or other Jews when the opportunity presented itself. By the millions, these people have remained silent.
Hundreds of thousands of students on campuses throughout Canada have remained silent as their elected student governments and student newspapers spewed forth anti-intellectual, morally obscene and racist assertions against Israel and against Jews.
When their allies in the trade union movement, in the New Democratic Party, in our human rights groups, wear buttons urging us to “Globalize the Intifada,” we remain conspicuously silent.
When incidents emerge, on campuses, in media and in public discourse, that should be condemned roundly by all people of goodwill, there is silence.
When universities host “Israel Apartheid Week,” during which an unrecognizably distorted interpretation is presented as history and fact, who but Jewish students speak up?
When students and professors call for universities to disallow ideas from Israel on the campus, how many deplore the self-defeating racism of this idea? (Some; not enough.)
When, year after year, police statistics and annual audits of antisemitic incidents show higher and higher numbers of occurrences of violence, threats and damage to property in the Jewish community, have these elicited commensurate sympathy or indignation?
When October 7th saw the horrific mass murder, mass rape, beheadings, immolations, torture and kidnappings of Jews, was there universal outrage? Not only was there a deafening amount of silence, there was even celebration among overseas progressives.
People who self-define as peace activists, who have COEXIST bumper stickers, who outlandishly consider themselves on the side of humanitarianism, mostly fell on a spectrum between joyful reveling at raped and decapitated Jews to the more staid: “It’s terrible, but …”
During the time of which we speak, progressive Canadians and others were far more likely to speak up against Jews and Israel than to address the incitement, violence and assault on civic values taking place constantly right here at home, in the name of progressive support for Palestine.
Perhaps Niemöller’s call to self-interest has been superseded by a variation on the dictum from poet Robert Frost, who once said: “A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.”
Never mind self-interest, plenty of progressive activist voices are now vigorously opposed to even Niemöller’s appeal to our own well-being.
More on the nose, since the advent of self-destructive anti-Western attitudes in the West, the approach seems to be: “It’s a battle between us and them. And we’re for them.”
Was Niemöller being facetious? Was he so cynical, albeit perhaps correctly, that non-Jews will not stand up for Jews unless there is something in it for them?
Whatever his motivations, and for all the mindless repetition of his words over the decades, we now see clearly that those who spout these words will not even speak out for Jews when it is their own self-interest.
In other words, the Niemöller poem is a pessimistic, selfish, lazy person’s response to injustice.
And the vast majority of non-Jews cannot even muster the energy to rise to that negligible request.
Six months after the pogram that Hamas unleashed, and I am still waiting for the various church synods to speak against Hamas. Individuals from these faiths have express sadness and support for the Jewish communities. The words from the Canadian leadership have left me cold, barely acknowledging the horros of October 7, and then emphasing the concern about the "innocent Gazan" who voted for Hamas and over 70% would do so again. The only innocent Gazans are the unborn. For the first time in long life that began in Canada, that I do not feel proud of being a Canadian Jew. I am only a Jew that was born her and still lives here. Many of my fellow Jews feel the same way! All the possible planned summits on Antisemitism will be a waste of time unless our Prime Minister and his followers acknowledge that Israel is our ancestoral homeland, and show the respect to it and to all Jews, even those living in Canada. Am Yisrael Chai!! The Jewish People Live! Another thought as an analogy: Years ago Italy won the World Cup in Football and everyone cheered regardless of their cultural backgound. Italian flags were everywhere. Well, it had happened, and thankfully it didn't, a horrible problem had arisen in Italy instead of a win, the streets of Toronto would have still be filled with Italian flags as a sympathic aknowledgement. But what did we see in Canada, as soon as it was learned that Israelis, (including many with Canadian roots) were massacred, raped, and taken hostage.: Terrorist flags were filling the streets. No, those flag wavers, many not Arab or Muslim, shouting Death to the Jews, From the River to the Seas, they are only PRO-Hamas. And they should all have charged with supporting a recognized terrorist organization. Most don't even know what river or what see, and don't, to this day, accept the fact that October 7 was carried out by Hamas and Gazans. And this weekend, many were dancing in the streets cheering when they learned about the rocket, etc, from Iran, an Islamofascist country, A land where a woman can be killed by not wearing hijab properly, gay men are murdered and hung in the town square, etc. This is what those flag wavers are cheering, and they should all be sent to Gaza, or Iran, then invalidate their passports so they can't return to Canada.
May be the forementioned poem may seem "lazy", but it is true!!
Yes, sadly, the silence is deafening. I get your cynicism about the virtue signaling use of the poem, that’s definitely there. But I think you might be blaming the poem for the hypocrisy a bit too much. I see it as the opposite, an attack on narrow, tribal self interest and a call to recognize common humanity. Kind of like John Donne’s famous sermon: “No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tolls for thee.” Only with the poem, it’s no ‘group’ is an island.