Reform Judaism isn’t Jewish. It’s an entirely different religion.

For two centuries, we’ve been told that Conservative, Reform, and Orthodox are “denominations” of the same faith — but what if they’re not?

A synagogue in Israel (photo: Stanislav Vdovin/Unsplash)

Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.

---

This is a guest essay by Sam Mitzmann, who writes about Jewish identity, values, and community.

You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, YouTube Music, YouTube, and Spotify.

---

Many Jews today assume Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform are simply three flavors of the same faith.

Different levels of observance. Different lifestyles. One Judaism.

That idea is comforting, but it obscures a more profound truth.

For thousands of years, Judaism meant one thing: the life and law of a people living by the covenant forged at Sinai. It was a complete system for living, encompassing the civil, the ritual, and the spiritual. It included rich and diverse variations — Yemenite, Sephardic, Hasidic, Lithuanian — but never fundamental contradiction. Every Torah scroll contained the same immutable text. Every line of authentic tradition, no matter how it was expressed, traced its authority back to the same divine Source.

Then, 200 years ago, something new appeared in the heart of Europe. Born of the Enlightenment and the pressures of social emancipation, a movement arose that did not seek to adapt the existing system, but to dismantle and replace its very foundations. While still claiming the name “Judaism,” it rejected the Source of that name.

Reform Judaism is not a loose forms of Judaism; it is a different religion, built on a different worldview, with a different god, and a different goal.

To see the fundamental split, we must go beyond surface-level aesthetics and examine the core operating system of each framework. A religion is defined by its answers to foundational questions: What is our ultimate authority? What is the nature of our law? And how is truth transmitted? The answers to these questions reveal not two denominations, but two incompatible religious structures.

1) On Authority & Revelation: God’s Word vs. Human Reason

Authentic Judaism is founded on the seismic event of national revelation at Sinai. The core belief is not just in a Creator, but in a Communicator. At Sinai, God revealed His eternal Torah directly to an entire people, establishing an objective, external constitution for reality.

This concept, Torah min HaShamayim (Torah from Heaven), means that the ultimate authority lies outside of human opinion, cultural trends, or subjective feeling. It is a truth that we are asked to live up to, not a text we are free to edit down.

Reform was born from a rejection of this premise. Emerging from 19th-century German intellectual circles, its founders were captivated by the Enlightenment’s emphasis on human reason and the “higher criticism” that treated the Torah as a flawed, human-authored historical document. They accepted the premise that the Torah was not a divine text, but a composite of myths, legends, and primitive laws compiled by different human authors over time.

Consequently, the ultimate authority shifted from God’s revealed will to the “evolving ethical conscience of the Jewish People.” Personal autonomy and subjective experience were elevated above the objective command of the text. The question was no longer “What does God require of me?” but “What feels meaningful to me?”

This is a different god and a different source of authority.

2) On Law & Practice: Covenantal Technology vs. Ethical Suggestions

In Judaism, the commandments (mitzvot) are the binding, practical expressions of the covenant. They are often misunderstood as a burdensome set of arbitrary rules. In reality, they are a holistic technology for infusing every moment of a mundane life with holiness and consciousness.

Shabbat is not merely a “day of rest,” but a weekly national testimony to God as Creator, a radical restructuring of time itself. The laws of Kashrut (kosher) are not a “Jewish diet,” but a discipline that forces awareness and self-control into the most basic animal act of eating. The laws of family purity are not archaic purity codes, but a framework for sanctifying marital intimacy. These practices are not symbols; they are the active, lived reality of the covenant. They are how a Jew connects to God.

Reform, in its drive to create a “rational” and modern faith, dismantled this entire structure. It adopted the philosophy of “Ethical Monotheism,” arguing that the “true” core of Judaism was its universal ethical teachings (e.g., “love your neighbor”), while the ritual laws were primitive vestiges of a pre-modern era that could be discarded. The commandments were no longer binding obligations, but recast as voluntary symbols or meaningful lifestyle “choices.”

One could “choose” to light Shabbat candles for their symbolic beauty, not because it was a commanded act. This effectively reduced the living, breathing framework of Jewish law into a menu of ethical suggestions and cultural decorations, little different from secular humanism.

3) On Transmission & Tradition: The Unbroken Chain vs. The Curated Museum

Judaism’s genius lies in its mechanism for change within a stable framework: the Mesorah, or the chain of transmission. This system holds that the Written Torah is inseparable from the Oral Torah (the Talmud and subsequent codes of law).

The Written Torah is the concise constitution; the Oral Torah is the multi-millennial body of jurisprudence that interprets, clarifies, and applies that constitution to new realities. Authority flows through this unbroken chain — from Moses to the Sages of the Talmud to the codifiers of the Middle Ages and the rabbis of today. This provides the only legitimate method for adaptation, ensuring that Judaism can evolve without ever breaking from its foundational principles.

Reform intentionally severed this chain. By declaring the Oral Torah to be a purely human, historical document with no divine authority, it was relegated to a piece of “historical literature.” It became an artifact in a museum to be studied for historical interest, not a binding legal guide to be lived.

With the chain of transmission broken, there was no longer a legitimate mechanism for adaptation. All that was left was reinvention. Clergy are now ordained by seminaries that deny the historical and divine basis of the very transmission they claim to be a part of. One framework is a living, continuous legal tradition; the other is a historical society curating a past it no longer believes in.

The difference could not be clearer: One framework is a system of faithful transmission, the other is a system of radical reinvention.

The Historical Precedent

We’ve seen this pattern of reinvention before. In the first century, a Jewish reform movement also claimed continuity with Torah while declaring its laws obsolete. It kept Jewish symbols, reinterpreted them, and centered belief on moral faith over practice. Within a century, that movement became Christianity.

Just as earlier breakaway movements from Judaism took on new names — Sadducees, Hellenizers, Karaites — this modern faith deserves one too. Whether it calls itself Reform or Reconstructionist, its essence is a system built on conformity to the surrounding culture. It might more accurately be called Conformism: a new religion that drew its culture and followers from Judaism but replaced revelation with the desire to fit in.

Before the 1800s, there was only Judaism. The term “Orthodox” was coined by reformers to brand traditional Jews as rigid and outdated. But nothing new was invented by those who stayed faithful; they simply continued to practice the same covenant their ancestors had for millennia.

The real split is Judaism versus Conformism: one is a transmission, the other a self-creation.

In pre-war Europe, comfort replaced conviction. Breaking from Torah wasn’t forced by hardship; it was chosen to blend in. Schools that once taught prayer and law began mocking it and teaching disbelief. Families that had guarded Judaism for centuries loosened it for convenience. When crisis came, the spiritual structure of those communities was already collapsing. The loss that followed was not only in lives but in continuity — a process of spiritual evaporation that had begun decades earlier.

The same pattern continues today. Most Jews identify culturally, but the covenant has faded from daily life. The result of treating the framework as optional is a catastrophic loss of Jewish literacy, practice, and identity. Intermarriage now outpaces in-marriage, and each generation grows smaller and less connected. We should be many times our size, yet we shrink — not from persecution, but from comfort.

A people cannot survive on memory and culture alone. When the living framework is treated as mere suggestion, continuity ends.

Here is a simple, challenging truth: You have likely never experienced authentic Judaism. What most Jews experienced is a reconstruction that keeps the familiar symbols but replaces the substance. You were encouraged to see the original framework as outdated and extreme, but never told that it is the same living system our ancestors fought to preserve.

This is your invitation to see what you were never shown. To discover the Judaism that is not what you think it is. You’ll discover learning that sharpens the mind, purpose that fills the day, and a community whose beauty and clarity will feel like home — a place where you don’t just belong, but are needed.

This is your inheritance: a place within a multi-millennial journey, one that has always been moving toward a time of ultimate goodness and light. Your unique contribution is essential to its completion.

Your people are still here, and we’ve been waiting and praying for you to come home.

---