The Four Israel's
There are four different "versions" of Israel. Only one is actually true.
Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.
You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify.
Share this essay using this link: https://www.futureofjewish.com/p/the-four-israels
Israel’s portrayal in global discourse and media makes for can’t-miss TV, influenced by confusing and conflicting narratives — the vast majority of which are nowhere remotely close to “real-life” Israel.
As I like to say, there is the Israel you see and hear about from afar, and then there is the actual Israel.
Israel in the Mainstream Media
The portrayal of Israel in mainstream media (news media and social media) is driven by partiality and superficial treatment of a incredibly complex subject.
While the media plays a crucial role in informing the public, its coverage of Israel frequently falls into reductive narratives that do not fully capture the multifaceted reality of the Jewish state and its intersection of history, religion, culture, socioeconomics, politics, and international relations.
Headlines and reports often emphasize violent incidents, military operations, and political tensions, portraying Israel as a nation in a constant state of war. This focus on conflict-driven news can create a skewed perception that reduces the complex historical, political, and social factors into a binary struggle between oppressor (Israel) and victim (the Palestinians).
Such coverage often lacks context, failing to explain the historical roots of the conflict, the variety of perspectives within Israeli and Palestinian societies, and the broader geopolitical dynamics at play.
What’s more, the voices of Israeli Arabs, secular Jews, religious minorities, and critics of the government’s policies are often underrepresented. Similarly, Palestinian perspectives are sometimes presented in a monolithic manner, ignoring the internal political divisions and differing viewpoints within Palestinian society. This lack of nuance prevents a comprehensive understanding of the intricate realities on the ground.
While the media’s emphasis on conflict is understandable given its newsworthiness, it often comes at the expense of covering broader societal issues within Israel. Stories about Israel’s technological advancements, economic developments, and cultural vibrancy are often overshadowed by conflict-related news.
Israel Through the Eyes of Antisemites
For antisemites (or the more fashionably named “anti-Zionists”), Israel is not just a nation but a symbol of deeper prejudices and conspiracy theories. Their portrayal of Israel is often based on unfounded accusations and extreme rhetoric, including:
Demonization and Dehumanization
Antisemites often demonize Israel, portraying it as an evil entity responsible for all regional instability. This narrative dehumanizes Israelis, depicting them as aggressors devoid of any legitimate historical or political claims to the land.
Conspiracy Theories
Israel is frequently at the center of various antisemitic conspiracy theories. These theories suggest that Israel (and by extension Jews) control global finance, media, and politics. Such beliefs are baseless but have a powerful influence on those who subscribe to them, fueling hatred and mistrust.
Apartheid and Genocide Accusations
A common antisemitic trope is the accusation that Israel is an apartheid state or is committing genocide against the Palestinians. These accusations are nothing short of exaggerated and unfounded, ignoring the complexities of the conflict and the efforts made by Israel to find peaceful solutions.
Denial of Israel’s Right to Exist
Some antisemites go so far as to deny Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign nation. They reject the legitimacy of the Jewish state’s establishment and advocate for its dismantling, often without offering viable solutions for peace or addressing the historical context of the region.
This perspective is rooted in hatred and prejudice, distorting the reality of Israel and its people. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes and fosters a climate of hostility and division
Overemphasis on ‘Settler Violence’
The settlers, particularly those living in Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank), have a distinct view of Israel — yet they make up less than 500,000 people (or about five percent of Israel’s population). Their perspective is shaped by religious beliefs, historical claims, and a sense of mission.
Many settlers believe in the biblical promise of the land to the Jewish People. This religious conviction drives their settlement in Judea and Samaria, which they see as an integral part of the historical Land of Israel. For them, living in these areas is a fulfillment of divine prophecy and a return to their ancestral homeland.
Other settlers live in Judea and Samaria simply because it is cheaper than living in “mainland” Israel. Still other settlers cite security concerns as a justification for their presence in Judea and Samaria, arguing that a strong Jewish presence in these areas is essential for the security of Israel — a buffer zone against potential threats. Dozens of Palestinian terror attacks emanating out of the West Bank have justified this claim.
The Government of Israel
Global perceptions of the Israeli government are frequently shaped by media coverage, political discourse, and social narratives that tend to oversimplify and polarize the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Israeli government is often viewed through a binary lens: as either a staunch defender of a democratic state or as an aggressive oppressor of Palestinian rights. This dichotomy fails to capture the multifaceted nature of Israeli politics and governance, which is influenced by a wide range of domestic and international factors.
While no government is perfect, Israel does indeed exhibit democratic institutions, while playing the role as a key ally of the West in the Middle East.
Israel’s political system is based on proportional representation and allows for a multi-party system, with numerous parties represented in the 120-seat Knesset (legislature). In the 2015 elections, for instance, 10 parties or alliances cleared the threshold to have at least one Knesset seat. As of writing, 18 parties or alliances are part of the current Knesset.
Still, the polarized perceptions of the Israeli government have significant implications for international relations and peace efforts in the Middle East. Countries and international bodies often align themselves along ideological lines, with some strongly supporting Israel and others advocating for Palestinian rights. This polarization can hinder diplomatic efforts, as parties may be more inclined to take sides rather than work towards mutually acceptable solutions.
Moreover, the portrayal of the Israeli government in global discourse can influence public opinion and policy decisions in other countries. In democratic societies, public sentiment plays a crucial role in shaping foreign policy. Biased or oversimplified views of the Israeli government can lead to policies that are unduly critical.
A more nuanced understanding of the Israeli government is essential for fostering constructive dialogue and advancing peace efforts. Recognizing the complexity of Israeli politics — including the diverse range of political parties, public opinions, and policy debates — can provide a more comprehensive picture of the government’s actions and motivations, both past and present.
It is also important to consider the security concerns, historical experiences, and domestic pressures that shape Israeli policies. Many criticisms that people have of Israel’s government have already been tried before by Israel and failed, or did not produce desirable results; if only these people would pick up a history book, they would know.
The Actual Israel
Amidst these varied perspectives, the actual reality of Israel often gets lost. Israel, in many ways, resembles a typical conservative country with its unique cultural and societal characteristics:
Political Landscape
Israel’s political landscape is diverse, with multiple parties representing a wide spectrum of ideologies.
However, recent trends show a shift towards more conservative and Right-wing politics. Issues such as national security, economic liberalism, and traditional values often dominate the political discourse.
Religious Influence
Religion plays a significant role in Israeli society. Judaism is deeply integrated into the national identity, influencing various aspects of life, from holidays and dietary laws to marriage and education.
The influence of Orthodox Judaism is particularly strong, affecting political decisions and societal norms.
Social Values
Israeli society tends to uphold conservative social values, particularly regarding family and community. Family is a central institution, and many families have a weekly Friday evening dinner to welcome in the Sabbath, some more religious than others.
The country has made strides in areas like LGBTQ+ rights, while conservative views on issues like marriage and religious observance remain prevalent.
Economic and Technological Growth
Economically, Israel is a blend of innovation and conservatism. It boasts a thriving tech sector and entrepreneurial spirit, often compared to Silicon Valley. And economic policies frequently reflect conservative principles, emphasizing free-market practices and entrepreneurship.
Israel also has a strong sense of socialism, most predominantly in healthcare and education, as well as a “safety net” for disadvantaged and others in need.
Cultural Resilience
Israelis exhibit a strong sense of cultural resilience and national pride. This resilience is shaped by historical experiences, including the Holocaust and ongoing regional conflicts. It fosters a collective identity centered around perseverance, innovation, and a commitment to the survival and prosperity of the Jewish state.
Challenges and Realities
Despite its successes, Israel faces significant challenges. Socioeconomic disparities, tensions between secular and religious communities, and the ongoing conflict with Iran and Qatar (which use the Palestinians as geopolitical pawns) are critical issues that impact daily life.
Understanding Israel requires navigating these varied perspectives and recognizing the multifaceted nature of its society. It is a nation rooted in ancient history yet constantly evolving, facing profound challenges while striving for innovation and resilience.
By acknowledging these different narratives, we can gain a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of Israel, beyond the simplistic and often polarized portrayals that dominate global discourse and media.
I think you were too soft on the press. They are lazy and just copy, without scrutinizing, what the AP and humanitarian groups report. This information is full of lies, misinformation, and extreme left views. From AP today: ....campaign of systematic destruction in Gaza, at the huge cost to civilian lives. This is definitely not the worst. Just a sample. Israel holding up aide and starving the Palestinians. I can't find The Real Israel ever in the western press.
There is no division in "palestinian" society when it comes to Israel, which the vast majority want to see destroyed.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"What’s more, the voices of Israeli Arabs, secular Jews, religious minorities, and critics of the government’s policies are often underrepresented. Similarly, Palestinian perspectives are sometimes presented in a monolithic manner, ignoring the internal political divisions and differing viewpoints within Palestinian society. This lack of nuance prevents a comprehensive understanding of the intricate realities on the ground".