I read the new ‘Gaza famine report’ so you don’t have to.
I read the new ‘Gaza famine report’ so you don’t have to.
What’s going on is the constant blurring of truths to fit one narrative — as has always been when it comes to Israel — and it is exhausting.
Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.
This is a guest essay written by Rachel Lester, an IDF reservist.
You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify.
Share this essay using the link: https://www.futureofjewish.com/p/the-new-gaza-famine-report
The June 2024 IPC Report about “famine in Gaza” is the most important thing going on in the world of Israeli diplomacy right now.
Are people in Gaza suffering from famine, or does this new report debunk everything the world has been saying (screaming) for the last four months?
The truth is, all I have seen on social media about this new report is either way too complicated or oversimplified to the point of being fake news. So I meticulously went through the 12-page document to see for myself exactly what it says, and it turns out it is worth the read. Let’s dive in.
What is in this report and why is it important?
The narrative that there is currently or projected to be famine in Gaza was based on “special reports” and “targeted analyses” published in March, April, and May by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET).
This organization has the U.S. Aid logo on their website but also a disclaimer that what is posted there is not official U.S. government information, so take that as you will. They use a five-phase scale called the “Integrated Food Security Phase Classification” (abbreviated as IPC) to classify current and projected levels of food insecurity.
At the top of this same organization, there is a Famine Review Committee (FRC) led by a team of four-to-six experts on food security and nutrition, whose job it is to conduct a Famine Review process on the aforementioned FEWS NET “special reports” and “targeted analyses.”
So when we talk about the new June 2024 IPC Report, this is all one organization reviewing its own data from April and its own projections for May, June, and July. The FRC report was published on the UN website, but it is unclear to me if the FRC is considered a UN agency, partner, or something else.
In layman’s terms: FEWS NET told the world there was currently/about to be famine in Gaza, and everyone believed them. FRC did a report on FEWS NET’s information.
Now, let’s dive into what this report actually found. I am going to list them in order of importance (in my opinion), not in order of appearance in the text.
Finding Number One
The FRC highlights two glaring omissions in the FEWS NET’s analysis of food in Gaza: FEWS NET “excludes the contribution of commercial and/or privately contracted deliveries” as well as “the contribution of World Food Program deliveries (flour salt, and yeast) to bakeries in northern Gaza.”
Without counting these two sources of food at all, FEWS NET came to the conclusion that Gaza was only receiving 59-to-63 percent of its caloric needs in April. Based on the FRC’s review of all of the food sources, however, the FRC estimates that Gaza would have 109 percent of its caloric needs met according to its low estimates — and 157 percent at its high estimate.
Wow, that sure does not sound like a famine to me.
Going even further, the FRC gives FEWS NET the benefit of the doubt: Maybe the commercial/privately contracted food deliveries and the bakery deliveries were “difficult to access, especially for the most vulnerable.” The FRC answers its own hypothetical question: “Unlikely.”
Finding Number Two
The lower FEWS NET estimates do suggest two key points:
That there was a significant increase in food availability from February to March to April, and
That nearly 100 percent of daily kilocalorie requirements were available for the estimated population of 300,000 people in April, even using conservative calculations
Yes, you read that correctly. Even according to the most conservative calculations made by the very people who have been crying “famine” in Gaza, what the pro-Israel movement has been saying for months is actually true: Israel has been delivering more food to Gaza than ever before — increasing amounts every day — and people in Gaza would have all the food they need if it was distributed by the UN properly.
Sweet validation.
Finding Number Three
“The FRC has some concerns with the methods by which the situation with regard to food availability in northern Gaza was calculated, which, combined with an incomplete understanding of food access makes the FEWS NET conclusions tenuous.”
Furthermore, the predictions for deaths caused by malnutrition or dehydration “are not supported by the available evidence for the current period of analysis.”
Why is that? Partially because there was much more food and water delivered to Gaza in April than in March. And partially because, as always, we just do not know enough about Gaza’s death count.
As the FRC says, “there remains considerable uncertainty about the death toll in northern Gaza during this period, particularly for non-trauma mortality.”
Preach.
Finding Number Four
“The FRC notes that the overall number of trucks entering the Gaza Strip and available food that FEWS NET used for its analysis is significantly less than reported by other sources.”
So the people who wrote the report that there is famine in Gaza (which there is not) were basing their claims on the last Big Lie: that Israel was not allowing enough humanitarian aid into Gaza (which they were).
This is why misinformation is so dangerous.
Finding Number Five
“To address major gaps in publicly accessible evidence, including direct and indirect evidence for food consumption and livelihood change, nutritional status, and mortality, FEWS NET relied on multiple layers of assumptions and inference.”
Excuse me?
They say that are assumptions and inference are “generally standard practice” (so maybe change your standard practices) but then acknowledge, rightfully, that “the limitations of available evidence … leads to a very high level of uncertainty regarding the current food security and nutritional status of the population.”
In other words, the entire narrative about famine in Gaza, the International Criminal Court’s charges of Israeli officials over starvation as a war crime, and the global pressure on Israel to stop operations in Rafah — the infinite ammo given to the rabid anti-Israel movement over the last few months — that was all based on uncertainty, assumptions, and inference.
Thanks so much, you guys, great work.
So, bottom line: Is there famine in Gaza? The FRC says there’s not enough information to know for sure. But the evidence they do have points “no.”
I do have to include the FRC’s overall points that they emphasize in the introduction: Whether or not there is technically famine “does not in any manner change the fact that extreme human suffering is without a doubt currently ongoing in the Gaza Strip.”
And, I mean, I do not think anyone on any part of the pro-Israel/anti-Israel spectrum is unaware that life in Gaza is really hard right now. If it needs to be repeated, I will repeat it: People in Gaza are truly suffering, in large part because Hamas is stealing large portions of the aid and because the UN is failing to distribute 1,000 truckloads (and counting) of aid that is currently just sitting at the border.
But the truth still matters.
It matters in principle and it matters in the daily international campaign to pressure Israel to stop the war before achieving our objectives.
It matters because it confirms that Israel “not delivering enough aid to Gaza” is, as we have been saying for months, slander.
It matters because support from our allies hinges on what’s actually going on in this war.
And what’s going on is the constant blurring of the truth to fit one narrative — as it always has been when it is about Israel — and it’s exhausting.
If I had to boil it down to one main takeaway: It is not possible to know exactly what’s happening real-time in a war zone.
Let’s remind the world to stop pretending like they do.
A version of this essay also appeared in The Times of Israel.
As a physician I find it quite awkward when scenes show mothers physically normal with very undernourished children. It’s expected from a mother to share their meal with their children as you see in any poor country. When you see a similar scene from Africa the mothers also look under nourished. In Gaza previously sick children pose as acute war resultant victims. SHAME on those fake news.
Gaza is a war zone but there is no famine there or danger of a famine like condition and any so called shortages are caused by Hamas