They're lying to us about the Gaza flotillas.
The truth is far darker than most headlines admit.
Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.
You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, YouTube Music, YouTube, and Spotify.
For years, Greta Thunberg has been the face of climate activism.
But these days, her name enters headlines for entirely different reasons: She was aboard one of the first ships intercepted in the so-called Global Sumud Flotilla — a 47-boat convoy claiming to deliver “aid” to Gaza, in direct violation of Israel’s maritime blockade on the Hamas-controlled territory.
The image of Thunberg being escorted by Israeli commandos off a seized vessel quickly ricocheted across social media. Admirers framed her as a brave activist standing up to power.
But the truth of the flotilla — and Greta’s role in it — is far darker than most headlines admit. The uncomfortable question must be asked: Is Greta Thunberg knowingly lending her moral capital to a Hamas operation?
On its face, the Global Sumud Flotilla marketed itself as a humanitarian mission, seeking to deliver supplies to “suffering Gazans.” Yet Israel, consistent with international law, maintains a maritime blockade to prevent weapons smuggling to Hamas. The Israeli Navy repeatedly warned the flotilla to reroute to the Port of Ashdod, where cargo could be inspected and transferred safely into Gaza. The activists refused.
That refusal is telling. If the mission were truly about delivering aid, the organizers would have accepted Israel’s terms. Instead, they pressed forward toward a confrontation designed to generate headlines.
And here is the damning fact: None of the 40 vessels participating in the Global Sumud Flotilla was carrying humanitarian aid, according to the Israeli Foreign Ministry. Israeli Police spokesperson Dean Elsdunne pointed out that the complete lack of aid explains why the organizers refused Israel’s and multiple countries’ offers to hand over supplies safely, avoid entering an active war zone, and stay within international law.
As Elsdunne put it bluntly: “It was never about bringing aid to Gaza. It was about the headlines and social media followings.”
In other words, there was never any aid to deliver. The flotilla’s purpose was provocation, not relief.
If Greta truly cared about feeding the hungry, her flotilla would have sailed in a very different direction. Right now, in Sudan, more than 700,000 children are teetering on the brink of death from acute malnutrition. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, over 28 million people face severe hunger. Those are genuine famines — silent catastrophes where aid is desperately needed and tragically scarce.
But no flotillas set sail for Sudan or Congo. No activists chained themselves to diesel-spewing boats demanding food convoys for starving Africans. Instead, Greta and her allies chose Gaza — not because it is the epicenter of world hunger, but because it is the epicenter of political theater. The flotilla was never a humanitarian mission; it was a stage play, scripted for maximum headlines.
The flotilla activists insist their voyage was necessary because Gaza is being “starved” of aid. But the facts tell a very different story. Since October 7th, more aid has actually entered Gaza than before the war. Israel has allowed convoys of food, medicine, fuel, and supplies through its crossings on a regular basis.
The problem is not getting aid into Gaza; it’s what happens once it arrives. Hamas has a long, well-documented pattern of seizing shipments, diverting fuel for its military tunnels, and even stealing food to sell on the black market. Ordinary Gazans suffer, not because Israel prevents aid, but because Hamas weaponizes it.
And yet, instead of working with Israel to ensure that aid reaches civilians, the United Nations and its affiliated agencies have chosen paralysis. They refuse to coordinate with Israel on distribution, lest they be seen as legitimizing the Jewish state. In practice, this means the UN has become an enabler of Hamas’ chokehold: better, in their eyes, to let Hamas control the flow — even if civilians starve — than to let Israel be seen as the one feeding Gazans.
It is a grotesque inversion of humanitarianism. The flotilla activists claim they are filling a “gap” in aid. But there is no gap. There is only a distribution crisis manufactured by Hamas and perpetuated by international institutions too cowardly — or too politically biased — to intervene.
The most explosive revelation came from Israel’s Foreign Ministry. Documents seized in Gaza during recent fighting allegedly show Hamas’ “direct involvement” in organizing the flotilla. Specifically, the papers detail coordination between flotilla leaders and Hamas’s foreign arm, the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad — an entity Israel designated as a terrorist organization in 2021.
The Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad effectively functions as Hamas’ diplomatic corps. One of its top officials, Zaher Birawi, has long been tied to anti-Israel flotilla efforts, including the infamous 2010 Mavi Marmara incident in which activists attacked Israeli commandos with knives and pipes. In fact, Thunberg herself was photographed at an event with Birawi directly behind her on stage — a shocking image in light of Hamas’ known role in funding, arming, and orchestrating flotilla activity.
Greta Thunberg first rose to fame by “school striking for the climate,” scolding the world for its carbon footprint, down to something as trivial as plastic straws. Yet here she is, sailing on a flotilla of diesel-guzzling boats that pumped out between 30-to-60 tonnes of carbon dioxide — for the second time in just three months.
Her supposed stand for Gaza wasn’t just politically reckless; it was an ecological disaster. The girl who once built her fame on saving the planet now seems willing to torch it for a photo op.
Part of Greta’s power has always been her youth. She was the angry child scolding adults at the UN: “How dare you!” That image made her untouchable. Critics were dismissed as bullies, while her age became a shield for her absolutist rhetoric.
This dovetails perfectly with Hamas’ propaganda model. Hamas, too, uses children as shields and symbols — parading dead or wounded minors to manipulate international opinion, and indoctrinating children in “summer camps” where they learn jihad rather than gymnastics. Greta and Hamas operate on different stages but follow the same script: weaponize the moral outrage of youth to silence criticism. In Greta, Hamas has found the ultimate Western counterpart to its own exploitation of children.
Greta’s activism also betrays glaring double standards. She has never organized flotillas for Yemen, where millions face famine; for Syria, where half a million have died; or for Uyghur Muslims imprisoned in Chinese camps. Only Gaza captures her sustained outrage.
Why? Because Gaza offers something those crises do not: a chance to demonize Israel, the world’s only Jewish state. It is not humanitarianism but ideology that explains why Greta’s compassion is so selective. She is not leading a flotilla for the oppressed; she is joining a flotilla designed to criminalize one country.
These flotillas do not operate in a vacuum. They are almost always tied to a global Islamist network funded by Qatar and supported by Turkey. These states bankroll Hamas, give platforms to its leaders, and support activist groups that run flotilla operations.
By joining the flotilla, Greta is not simply “helping Gazans.” She is inserting herself into a geopolitical axis that launders jihadist violence through Western civil society campaigns. Whether she knows it or not, she has become another face of a network that stretches from Doha to Istanbul to Gaza City.
Greta’s brand is built on moral urgency — on telling the truth no matter how uncomfortable. But that brand cuts both ways. With such influence comes responsibility. By aligning with a flotilla operation that has clear ties to Hamas, she cannot claim innocence.
Her presence legitimizes Hamas, delegitimizes Israel, and misleads millions of followers who (for some reason) trust her. Greta is no longer just a climate activist. She is a political weapon whose moral capital has been co-opted into the service of terror.
So, is Greta Thunberg in bed with terrorists? The evidence is damning. She boarded a flotilla operation with known Hamas ties, stood alongside a Hamas proxy leader, and refused lawful offers to deliver aid through legitimate channels. And as Israel revealed, not one of the 40 vessels in the flotilla carried humanitarian aid at all. The entire operation was a PR stunt, not a relief mission.
At best, Greta is being exploited. At worst, she has become a willing partner in Hamas’ propaganda war. Either way, her choices force us to confront an unsettling truth: In the age of social media activism, the line between speaking for the oppressed and enabling terrorists has never been thinner.
Greta Thunberg is a moral whore. We should flood the airwaves with such simple truthful soundbites. She is a self-deluded con artist who should be arrested at the closest opportunity. Laws are being broken. Incitement and support for terrorism. Time to make that count.
No aid on boats tells the whole story of this flotilla. No more need be said. What a sham.