Please consider supporting our mission to help everyone better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world. A gift of any amount helps keep our platform free of advertising and accessible to all.
This is a guest essay written by David Josef Volodzko, a writer with words in New York Magazine, Foreign Policy, The Nation, Bloomberg, Forbes, and The Wall Street Journal.
You can also listen to the podcast version of this essay on Apple Podcasts, YouTube Music, YouTube, and Spotify.
The problem in Palestinian society is not Hamas.
It is not the establishment of the State of Israel or any of the conflicts that have been waged as a result.
The problem in Palestinian society is not a consequence of the conditions under which Gazans live, which are not remotely as bad as you may think on any metric — given that Palestinians are far wealthier, healthier, and safer than any picketing nitwit might imagine.
Nor is the problem to do with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, retaliatory IDF airstrike campaigns, the “Nakba” displacement of Palestinians, U.S. foreign policy, or Iranian regional meddling.
In the simplest terms, the problem — and, indeed, the root cause of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians — lies with the Palestinian people themselves and their hate-soaked culture.
We are only now waking up from the misguided efforts of Franz Boaz, Michel Foucault, and the rest of the moral relativists who convinced so many of us to drink deep of the lie that all religions are created equal and all cultures are worth saving.
Yet we know better than to pretend the culture of contemporary New Zealand is comparable to the culture of Nazi Germany. The militarist culture of Imperial Japan and the jihadist culture of Islamist Iran are abject failures whose legacies include such achievements as the Nanjing Massacre and October 7th.
Of course, even the worst cultures are not wholly bad. There are many unspeakably beautiful aspects of Iranian culture. More importantly, jihadism does not represent all Iranians and not all Germans supported the Nazis. In fact, only 38.7 percent of eligible German voters did so in 1933, and that number later rose to 44 percent.1 About 25 percent of Hutu men took part in the Rwandan genocide in one way or another, and 75 percent did not.2
Therefore, because there is always something to be saved and because no people are ever wholly to be condemned, we always have reason to try. Thankfully in the case of both Germany and Japan, we were able to save their victims and their own citizens not only from the regimes that ruled them, but from the hell we would have otherwise been forced to visit upon them had their salvation been impossible.
Germany is today one of the greatest countries in the world and the economic raft of Europe, while Japan holds a similar position in Asia and its people are arguably the kindest and most polite of any on Earth. This is an absolutely stunning achievement. We took two of the most powerful and evil regimes in history and transformed them into liberal, peace-loving societies.
How was this miracle accomplished?
Quite simply, we occupied both nations, reeducated, and democratized their populations, restructured their governments, put their war criminals on trial, and demilitarized and denazified their societies. We ripped them down to the bone and started fresh.
We should do the same with Palestinians.
Whether Israel colonizes Gaza and the West Bank or temporarily imposes a military occupation until the rate of violent psychopathy drops significantly below 80 percent, either would be better for both sides than the status quo. As it stands, 82 percent of West Bankers believe what Hamas did on October 7th was “correct.”3
This is not isolated to October 7th either. The Palestinian movement was in part begun by the former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, a literal Nazi who sent Jewish children to Nazi death camps and later laughed about it. Nor have they ever conducted themselves with anything resembling human decency.
In 1971, two Palestinian terrorists murdered Jordanian Prime Minister Wasfi Tal. The Palestinians had set up shop in Jordan to launch terrorist attacks against Israel.
Jordan was not about to let a band of psychopaths wage war from its front yard, so it told them to leave and they responded by assaulting families, torturing and executing people, and assassinating the prime minister. When they killed Tal, one of the assassins got down on his knees like a dog and began lapping up the blood.4 A more literal example of bloodthirsty savages you will never find.
Yet this is exactly the sort of thing Palestinians celebrate. These are their heroes. Bloodthirsty savages dancing around the corpses of raped teenage girls. Infants in ovens. Elderly passersby stabbed in the neck for the crime of being Jewish.
This is not just part of their culture, but has become the central theme of their culture, and I only say this because it is what repeated surveys show, year in and year out, across multiple acts of terrorism and endless instances of brutal violence and rape, because their own leaders explicitly say they want genocide and because they and their supporters explicitly chant for genocide. This is not an accusation. They brag about it themselves.
Palestinians are more genocidal, in terms of civilian support for genocidal violence, than the Germans were under Hitler. Twice as much, in fact. What’s more, Germans had long suffered grueling conditions, the kind that can sour the brain and radicalize good people to support evil things, the kind that pro-Palestinians protesters claim justifies the violence of Hamas.
In the 1930s, about 6 million Germans were unemployed, and thanks to World War I reparations payments, the German economy was in freefall. Germany had no international credit rating. The nation was near bankruptcy. Hyperinflation during the Weimar Republic had reached rates of 30,000 percent per month, which meant prices doubled every other day or so. People were struggling to recover from the war and now they had zero chance of even keeping up.
By contrast, Gaza before the current war looked like a tropical resort. In fact, Gazans themselves have posted videos of Gaza before the war to highlight the contrast now that many areas have been reduced to rubble. But the before is just as shocking to many as the after because some of the images look better than many European cities.
In addition to living in a beachside garden while murdering Jewish children over their alleged and self-imposed oppression, consider the fact that Gazans live longer and are wealthier than the global average, are more obese, better funded, enjoy less densely crowded cities than many Israelis, and yet still pretend as if they have it worse off than Syrians.
So, on what basis are Palestinians oppressed?
The “occupation,” they tell us. But this in fact ended in 2005 when Israel evacuated every member of its army from the Gaza Strip, dismantled all 21 Israeli settlements, and removed 8,000 settlers, going house to house and breaking down doors when necessary.
The withdrawal was absolute and severe. Israel sent in demolition crews to raze 2,800 homes and 26 synagogues, shattering communities and demoralizing families. They even took apart a cemetery in the Gush Katif settlement and removed its 48 graves. Some called it a desecration.
There was also the question of what to do with the settlers’ lush greenhouses. A number of settlers simply gave their greenhouses to the Palestinians to help them develop their economy, but many were unwilling to simply forgo such a valuable possession, so a group of American Jewish donors paid $14 million to buy over 3,000 greenhouses, which they then gave to the Palestinians. The Palestinians in turn destroyed the greenhouses as the Palestinian Authority sat back and watched.5
In the end, Israelis and Jews abroad destroyed communities on their side, dug up graves, and spent millions to give the Palestinians a home with running water, so to speak. But the Palestinians do not want a home, and have never wanted one. They want a base of operations for the Holocaust. Give them running water and they will take the plumbing apart to beat Jews to death with galvanized pipes.
So, although the narrative regarding the “occupation” of Gaza is little more than a poorly constructed lie, it is also not a bad idea. Maybe Israel should occupy Gaza, or even colonize it for a few decades. If the alternative is waiting for the next Hamas attack and then either allowing Jewish civilians to be slaughtered or retaliating — which, given the way Hamas has deliberately set up the chess board, means far more Gazans will die — then it would clearly be best for everyone to avoid more death on both sides.
If you truly cherish Palestinian life, then you have to recognize that to truly liberate the Palestinian people necessarily includes liberating them not only from Hamas but from their own genocidal racist hatred. Because every crime Israel is accused of committing against the Palestinians, Hamas is already doing and doing many times worse — to the Palestinians. More than this, they have no real future until we can liberate their children from the idea that their lives are without meaning except in the act of murdering Jews.
I am not suggesting Israel adopt a scorched earth policy. In fact, I think Israel should end the airstrikes, which cause more loss of life than necessary. Instead, Israel should never have left Gaza in the first place. Palestinians have proven what they want and remind us of it every chance they get. Their leaders go on television to remind us also. The people themselves support these leaders more when they say such things and even more when they follow through. What they want, and are painfully clear about wanting, is another Holocaust.
Therefore, Israel should remain in Gaza, occupy it or even colonize it, tear the disgusting racism from their textbooks, put Hamas members on trial, rebuild their economy, liberate their women, ensure the safety of their gay and trans members, intellectuals, artists, and non-Muslims, and build a future for their people.
I have hope that this is possible because Gazans are turning on Hamas and coming to grow sick of the costs of their own genocidal hatred. While 82 percent of people in the West Bank think October 7th was good, only 57 percent of Gazans agree.6
In previous years, it has generally been the case that Gazans are more extremist, not less. But the weight of this particular war falls more fully upon their shoulders, and it seems their backs are beginning to break. Perhaps they are losing their appetite for blood. Or perhaps their love of their own children is finally outgrowing their hatred of Jewish children.
As Christopher Hitchens once said of Iraq, the war against Gaza is a war for Gaza. Colonizing Gaza will not only keep Jewish children safe, but also prevent further loss of life on the Palestinian side when the next generation again attempts genocide and Israel again pounds them into the sand.
This will also help put them on the path to economic and societal progress, because despite everything I have written above, they are still a people in possession of a culture, despite its flaws, that is worth saving, and they still deserve a chance to thrive and be happy.
Their children can thank us later.
“Ordinary Economic Voting Behavior in the Extraordinary Election of Adolf Hitler.” THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY.
“Social networks and close quarters: why some killed in Rwanda and others didn’t.” The London School of Economics and Political Science.
“Public Opinion Poll No (90).” Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research.
“Jordan remembers Wasfi Tal.” Ammonews.net.
“What, Exactly, Is Hamas Trying to Prove?” The Atlantic.
“Public Opinion Poll No (90).” Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research.
Thank you David. I have come to question the use of the term 'palestinians'. It seems to me at best it is an appropriation and distortion of history. I'm fine with Arab-Israeli or Israeli-Arab. Fine with Bedouin, Druze, Sephardim, Mizrahi, Israeli dual citizens of all sorts. A few times you used "Gazans". What is the difference, or differences between "Gazans" and 'palestinians'? Not that you can't use whatever term you want of course, but, personally I don't utter 'west bank' any more. I use only Samaria and Judea. The whole world so-to-speak changed Oct 7, 2023. Personally, I can readily see, understand, hope, accept complete Israeli ownership of Samaria and Judea; and Gaza; and Golan Heights; and southern 'lebanon' at least up to the Litani River. I'm quite ready to accept more in whatever way the IDF, the Israeli government(s) now and future as a continuum deems necessary, correct, or beneficial to the well being of The State of Israel, the Israeli People. If one understandably asks 'but what about international law'. For those logical people I might refer them to the hateful abuse directed VIA international law to assault and intimidate and threaten The State of Israel; The Land of Israel; The Homeland of the Jewish People.
I also love this article. A non-Jew, I have always been on the side of Israel and the Jews, and my feelings have been set in concrete by the horrors of October 7. I also have an antipathy for Islamicism, reinforced by two years of living in Pakistan (1988–1990). I recommend that experience, even for six months, for every ignorant American who's wearing a keffiyah and chanting anti-Israel slogans. If and when allowed back into the US, they would throw themselves on the ground and kiss the soil in gratitude. They have no idea of the vast gulf between Islamic and Judaeo-Christian cultures.
I am also a retired editor, and I know this is nitpicky, but I tried to find the source for this: "When they killed Tal, one of the assassins got down on his knees like a dog and began lapping up the blood.4" The source is given as ammonews.net, which is invalid. It's ammonnews.net (with two Ns), and the English version is here: https://en.ammonnews.net/article/19243.